How many moratoriums needed before mRNA injections are called off?

Patientmakt has previously reported on scientific and political moratoriums that have been announced. The question is how far it still has to go until the mRNA / modRNA injections are stopped. Duing Covid-19 and when these experimental gene-therapy injections were used for the first time as massvaccination purposes and during that time a lot of reporting about the negative effects have been shown. Politicians do not seem to listen. Does any pharmaceutical company really care about public health at all? Dr. Aseem Malhotra has in speeches explained the pharmaceutical industry only has obligations towards their shareholders and not what really happens to the public or what public concerns are. Have you all seen the movie Dopesick where CEO in the pharmaceutical industry just made up thesises on why to put in higher doses with no medical claims to support them to make more money because the company could be at loss…

The fourth moratorium about the gene-therapy mRNA / modRNA injections has recently appeared. It is part 2 from the previous part 1 on a moratorium declared concerning to stop the use in pregnant women. “The COVID-19 modified mRNA (modmRNA) lipid nanoparticle-based “vaccines” are not classical antigen-based vaccines but instead prodrugs informed by gene therapy technology. Of considerable note, these products have been linked to atypical adverse and serious adverse event profiles. As discussed in Part 1, health-related risks and drawbacks were drastically misreported and underreported in the Pfizer and Moderna trial evaluations of these genetic products.” This new part 2 focuses a variety of side-effects linked to the experimental Covid genetic injections.

“Now in Part 2, we examine the main structural and functional aspects of these injectables. The COVID-19 modmRNA injectable products introduce a unique set of biological challenges to the human body with the potential to induce an extensive range of adverse, crippling, and life-threatening effects. Based on the fact that there is no current method to quantify host (cell-based) spike protein production in vivo following injection with these prodrugs, there is no standard “dose”. This is in part due to differences in spike protein production output, which depends on cell metabolism and transfection efficiency. It is therefore difficult to predict adverse event profiles on an individual basis, but considering that millions of adults across the world have reported severe and serious adverse events in the context of these modmRNA COVID-19 products, valid concerns are raised regarding injection of infants and younger age groups for whom COVID-19 poses only minimal risks. We address the process-related genetic impurities inherent in mass production of these products, and the potential risks posed by these contaminants. We then categorize the principal adverse events associated with the modmRNA products with a brief systems-based synopsis of each of the six domains of potential harms: (1) cardiovascular, (2) neurological, (3) hematologic; (4) immunological, (5) oncological, and (6) reproductive. We conclude with a discussion of the primary public health and regulatory issues arising from this evidence-informed synthesis of the literature and reiterate the urgency of imposing a global moratorium on the modmRNA-LNP-based platform.”

Study: COVID-19 Modified mRNA “Vaccines”: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials, Mass Vaccination, and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, Part 2

---

Moratoriums previously reported on Patientmakt:

A new population based study published end of June 2024 comparing patientsafety issues in pregnant women comparing the influensa vaccine and the Covid genetic injections show considerable safety concerns:

• Conclusions: We found unacceptably high breaches in safety signals for 37 AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women.

• An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is warranted.

• The United States government, medical organizations, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies have misled and/or deceived the public regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Promotion of these products must be immediately halted.

Study: Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I

In February 2024 a global moratorium on the Covid injections was declared and that these injections be removed from childhood vaccination programs.

Abstract - Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

Study: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign

The EU parliament has issued a moratorium on mRNA / modRNA injections for both human and veterinary use:

In a short message made in the EU Parliament (part of a longer speech) the need for a moratorium on mRNA vaccines has been declared.

• The speaker explains mRNA can get into human breastmilk and children are being fed undefined doses of mRNA.

• mRNA vaccines have also been developed for veterinary use and have been used for some time. mRNA get into the meat of animals people eat, get into the milk people drink and most probably also into eggs people eat.

• Humans are currently unknowingly subjected to undefined and undeclared doses of mRNA in their daily consumption.

More scientific facts on why mRNA / modRNA injections never should be given to pregnant women or women who are considering becoming pregnant: