Fraudulent behaviour from the Swedish Medicines Agency on Covid injections and pregnancy

Sweden, Tobias Hietala follow up to the commentary Why do authorities campaign ineffective, harmful vaccines? now with a focus on recommendations to give pregnant women Covid mRNA injections, Discussion with the medicines agency, outdated information, pregnancy and the elephant in the room. Tobias did not get the replies he was on the lookout for in his first commentary when he emailed the Swedish Medicines Agency. For those of you who are new to this substack he asked how the medicines agency still could continue to push for more mRNA injections despite the fact they are proven to be ineffective. This has also been commented upon by Matti Sällberg in Sweden who works with vaccineproduction. Matti has explained the spikeprotein of the Sars-Cov-2 virus mutates too fast for the mRNA injection makers to be keep up with the mutations and this makes the mRNA injections useless for protection against Sars-Cov-2. The Swedish Medicines Agency claimed Tobias has misunderstood Matti Sällbergs information beacause the Medicines Agency claim the benefits outweigh the risks about the Covid mRNA injections and they are constantly updated against the new variants that are circulating.

The International Covid Summit III in the EU Parliament: David Martin explained the scientific research for vaccines against coronaviruses never showed any success since the coronavirus mutates too quickly for the covid vaccine to be able to match the mutations of the coronavirus. Every scientific article published 1990 - 2018 on this matter shows that.

In this new commentary Tobias Hietala takes us to the homepage of the Swedish Medicines Agency about the covid vaccines. The information has not been updated since 2022 and is seriously outdated. Information on side effects are only about mild adverse events. None of the serious adverse events or the risk of disability is mentioned on the Swedish Medicines Agency. The Covid mRNA is still recommended to pregnant women on this homepage but the recommendations from the Public Health Agency for this upcoming vaccination campaign is only for older people or persons considered risk groups.

Tobias phones to speak with the medicines agency and he askes why they are still recommending these injections and why it was not enough with only two doses as would be the case for public health interventions. Tobias questions if the vaccination campaign is promoting the mutations of the virus and thus makes the vaccination campaign really worthless. The respondent cannot reply to this.

A scientific study has shown variants are highly likely the product of non-natural processes including artificial genetic modification, published in IPSJ Trans. on Bioinformatics. Research is conformed from the patents about the experimental genetic mRNA injections that genedeletion functions of these injections also promote genetic mutations of the variants. Previously also mentioned and published on Patientmakt a political science corruption study has shown the massinjection campaign augmented the death rate of Covid-19 by 430 % and augmented the spread of the Sars-Cov-2 virus by 260 %.

Tobias asks the medicines agency with regards to the outdated recommendations they still have on their home page about having pregnant women covid injected if they have read the preclinical studies from Pfizer where these studies show the risks are very high for pregnant women. Pfizers preclinical study showed the mRNA injection leads to birth defects, stillbirths and miscarriage. The mRNA enter the placenta and this injection format is not to be recommended to pregnant women. The Swedish Medicines Agency never even heard of these preclinical studies and refer to some nordic studies that instead claim the opposite of Pfizers preclinical studies. Tobias questions that in other cases pregnant women are warned to not use aspirin since it can affect the fetus. The Medicines Agency is only caught up in the narrative of protecting against Covid-19 and cannot take into consideration the risk information Tobias is trying to discuss. Tobias is trying to give the medicines agency guy a comparison to an over the counter drug and an experimental genetic injection to consider the difference in riskfactor.

Tobias points out the current status of the medicines agency homepage does not help with informed consent that is a requirement in the swedish patient act before receiving and accepting or declining a medical treatment option. The medicines agency then appeals to the leaflets. Leaflets are not shown to patients in healthcare. Regarding risks for pregnant woment Tobias reminds the Swedish Medicines Agency it was a court order in the USA that forced Pfizer to release its preclinical data. On Pfizers leaflets they falsely claimed there was no data concerning their mRNA injection and pregnant women.

Currently Sweden does not officially recommend pregnant women to be Covid vaccinated (unless they are a risk group the public health agency recommends to be vaccinated). Despite the fact Sweden does not have a general Covid vaccination recommendation for pregnant women the Swedish Medicines Agency to this day recommends pregnant women to be Covid vaccinated.

Below you can see an image from Tobias latest commentary showing the decline in birth rates since the rollout of the Covid vaccines in Sweden.

Tobias Hietala commentary in Swedish:

Sens morale - always question the information from authorities and medical leaflets. This commentary shows what authorities do not know, do not track and do not understand and how they do not protect patients rights and are not updated.

---

The World Council for Health in Denmark recently published information from scientific studies showing covid vaccines should not be recommended for pregnant women. By Dr. Jeanne A. Rungby.

The mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines have also proven to be far from safe for pregnant women and fetuses, as documented in 2 new studies, which are described in the following: Thorp et al, in a comprehensive study of adverse event reports, found that the risk of spontaneous abortions, fetal malformations, fetal chromosomal changes, fetal arrhythmias, fetal cardiac arrest, premature births and stillbirths was highly significantly increased for the Covid-19 vaccines compared to all other vaccines.

Study: Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I

Another brand new Japanese article has found that antibodies to phosphatidylethanolamine increased significantly after Covid-19 vaccines compared to before vaccination in the same test subjects (p: 0.008). Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine are a known finding in women with recurrent miscarriages. An alarming finding indeed.

Study: Comparison of anti-phospholipid antibody titers before and after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in hospital staff

In addition, there are a number of claims in the article, which either refer to sources that do not work or to other sources, in which there are also no sources for documentation for e.g. a. the following statement: "Awareness of the harmful consequences of TORCH infections has in many countries, including Denmark, led to successful strategies for vaccination" The source specified does not exist (source 13).
"Vaccination in connection with a pregnancy is a well-established strategy to protect both the pregnant woman, the fetus and the newborn child against the corresponding infection [19]." Source no. 19 does not document the above claim. It refers to the Danish Health Authority's recommendations for pregnant care. In this source 19, Section 8, which deals with vaccines, no documentation is given in the form of reference to valid studies documenting claims of safety during pregnancy. I will refrain from commenting on other vaccines (influenza, pertussis and more) as it will be too comprehensive. It is only clear at this point that many of the vaccines mentioned in the article are in the pipeline as mRNA-based vaccines, which can be seen at the National Institute of Health's (NIH) clinicaltrails.gov This means, as I see it, that once we get used to these vaccines being given to pregnant women, the manufacturing method is switched to the mRNA technology, at process 2, which will not be controlled in regular good regulatory practice (GRP). Quite as we have seen it happen with the Covid-19 mRNA injections. The article is therefore perceived as a completely hidden marketing attempt, where doctors must gradually get used to breaking with the principle that we do not test new medicines on pregnant women and fetuses.

---

World Council for Health UK in April 2023:

The WCH recommends an urgent investigation into the worldwide observable birth decline starting nine months after the vaccine rollout in many countries and the increasing reports of pregnancy complications.

• While pregnant and breastfeeding women were excluded from the original Pfizer and Moderna trials because of the urgency of approval, Pfizer confirmed it stopped its clinical trial analyzing Covid-19 vaccine safety and efficiency in pregnant women early in 2023. 

• Pfizer’s published study in reproductive toxicology showed a nearly 300% increase in skeletal malformations in babies and a doubling of the pre-implantation embryo loss in injected female rats.

• 40,300 adverse endocrine events (AEEs) were reported in VAERS following Covid-19 vaccinations. The main emphases of the AEEs were menstruation abnormalities (e.g., Menstruation Irregular (3911 entries), Dysmenorrhoea (2166), Menstruation Delayed (1262), Amenorrhoea (863), Polymenorrhoea (777), Oligomenorrhoea (686), Hypomenorrhoea (202), Menopause (168), and metabolic imbalances. Studies have shown a considerable underreporting rate, making actual rates up to 100 times higher. 

• Currently, the MHRA yellow card system includes 6,510 cases of maternal and fetal vaccination exposure during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Studies have shown a considerable underreporting rate, which may be 40 to 100 times higher. For reproductive and breast disorders, there are 58,698 reports. 

• A recent study comparing the Covid injections to the flu vaccine found a 57 times higher rate of miscarriage, a 38 times higher rate of fetal death and stillbirth, and 15 other major pregnancy complications exceeding the regulator’s safety threshold. 

• Studies have shown that lipid nanoparticles, like those used in the Covid injections, cross the placental barrier and can harm the fetus and that the used lipid nanoparticle drive mRNA delivery to the placenta with unknown consequences. 

• The Federal Institute for Population Research in Germany described evidence of the 2022 birth declines in Germany and Sweden, concluding a strong association between the onset of vaccination programs and the fertility decline nine months after this onset. 

---

The mRNA injection is made to inhibit the hormonal processes of female eggs in the ovaries. The mRNA stopps fertility at the source by stopping the release of female eggs.

Study: The direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccination on human ovarian granulosa cells explains menstrual irregularities

We found unacceptably high breaches in safety signals for 37 AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women. An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is warranted.

Study: Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I

A peer-reviewed study warns Covid mRNA shots cause brain damage in offspring when administered to mothers during pregnancy.

Study: Covid Shots during Pregnancy Cause Brain Damage in Offspring, Study Warns

Study shows women injected with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines experience 34% lower pregnancy rate when undergoing IVF treatment compared to unvaccinated women.

Reference: McCullough Foundation

Swedish study: The first trimester of pregnancy (when major organs form) is the most dangerous period to give Covid vaccines to pregnant mothers!

Reference: COVID Vaccines Are Most Dangerous in the First Trimester of Pregnancy, Study Suggests

This is how the COVID vaccine managed to be sold as "safe in pregnancy" when it was far from it. This article shows you how the data was misrepresented by the CDC and others to cover up the scandal.

Reference for more information: Proof that the miscarriage rate after the COVID vaccines is far higher than the real background rate and how the pharma corporations tried to hide it.

COVID shots were associated with 57 times more miscarriages, 16 times more fetal cardiac arrests, and 20 times the number of fetal abnormalities as the flu shot.

Study: COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function

Placentagate: Lipid NanoParticles have been seen to and designed to get to and through the placenta, into placental cells fundamental to pregnancy and fetal viability, implantation, and development. Certain published claims that this has been done with “no toxicity” appear to be potentially false, with data proving the falsehood having been deliberately hidden or obfuscated within published research data using specific methods of data handling, classification and presentation. Some of this data from various research, including manufacturers, indicates that foetus loss increases - in one study doubling - in correlation with Covid vaccination i.e. there are major signals that LNPs cross the placenta, get into foetuses at all stages of development and can lead to foetal loss at various stages of pregnancy, despite Male et al claiming “no toxicity” and “no evidence of” toxicity. Some of the foetal losses occur so early that they are literally ignored and not counted as foetal losses in some of the research, which goes on to claim “no toxicity” by virtue of effectively having deliberately not looked for toxicity in certain foetuses.

Reference: Jikkyleaks drops a bombshell inside the blood brain barrier crater

Risks of mRNA to pregnan women:

1) increase in menstrual abnormalities increased by 1192-fold

2) abnormal menstruation by 1192-fold

3) miscarriage by 75-fold

4) fetal malformation by 20-fold

5) fetal cardiac disease by 16-fold

6) fetal growth restriction by 25-fold

7) oligohydramnios by 16-fold

8) preeclampsia by 24-fold

9) fetal death by 38-fold.

Reference: Experimental, Never before Tested Novel Genetic Therapy (COVID mRNA gene injection) Pushed in Pregnancy. The Most Egregious Violation of Ethics in the History of Medicine

Risks for women wanting to get pregnant:

• COVID-19 vaccines contain a spike protein called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of the placenta. If the vaccine triggers an immune response to this protein, then female infertility, miscarriage, and/or birth defects could result.

The Swedish Medicines Agency claim mRNA injections do not alter human DNA and that is a lie. The mRNA injections are illegal GMO. Scientific research on the mRNA injections prove injected DNA is passed to offspring. Covid mRNA injections break the Swedish Act (2006:351) on genetic integrity Section 3 Gene therapy: § 4 Treatment methods that intend to bring about genetic changes that can be inherited in humans may not be used.

• A disturbing new study has revealed that Covid mRNA shots permanently alter the DNA of those who receive the injections. Alarmingly, however, these dangerous changes to the DNA will be passed on to the offspring of the Covid-vaccinated. Study published by U.S. National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Library of Medicine.

• Doctors 4 Covid Ethics open letter: This open letter explains the dangers posed by mRNA vaccines, namely, that cells and tissues which take up the vaccine particles will suffer destruction at the hands of the immune system, and furthermore that cells which evade destruction may end up being genetically modified. The risk of genetic modification also pertains to egg and sperm cells and therefore to future generations. Both risks are inherent in this vaccine technology — they are not limited to the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 alone.

• “I had the pleasure of discussing with @RefugeOfSinner5 the blatant judicial misconduct of judge Helen Rofe in our GMO proceedings, undertaken to stop the Truth of the Pfizer and Moderna drugs being illegal GMOs from reaching Australians and The World.” Retied attorney of law Julian Gillespie expert on GMO. Reference: Seek justice - An interview with Julian Gillespie

• Covid-injected people are now thought to be considered the intellectual property of the U.S. Department of Defense patent holders, because humans have been synthetically ‘genetically modified’. DR LISA HUTCHINSON, Digital takeover of our bodies - Hacking humans to harness our energy, The Light

Tobias Hietalas first commentary below where you will also find the documentary Safe and Effective the Side Effects that disappeared with english subtitles.

Nothing was really explained to women who were pregnant or who wanted to get pregnant. There was never proper informed consent. Please read the petition below and sign it and help inform others.

EU Citizens Initiative Trust and Freedom for informed consent and political transparency.

Informed consent for healthcare is not enough. Informed consent needs to be expanded towards human- and civilrights goals. The EU Citizens Initiative have through the Trust and Freedom initiative created a petition for member states to expand on the role of informed consent also in society.

Goal

We call on the European Commission to adopt legislation that promotes freedom, openness, accountability and individual engagement within the EU. The aim is to establish and strengthen the division of powers and to ensure that the EU institutions are responsive to the needs and interests of individuals and at the same time uphold the human rights recognized in the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.

1: Upholding human dignity and recognizing informed consent

We call on the European Commission to present a recommendation on a draft legislative act for the Member States in terms of defining informed consent and promoting human dignity and freedom and the right to decide over one's own body within the EU.

2: Increased openness and citizen influence

We request that the EU Commission introduce a legal act that increases transparency in and access to information about the EU's decision-making processes.

Find the petition here!