A new study from Paris published by JAMA shows the Covid vaccines have 84 % negative efficacy 6 - 9 months after people have been injected. Médicos pela Vida Official (Doctors for Life Official) from Brazil reported on this new study and also reminded of the Cleveland study from the USA also showing negative efficacy of the Covid injections already in June 2023.
A study recently published in the prestigious journal JAMA , led by scientist Charlotte Laniece Delaunay, from the Department of Epidemiology, Epiconcept, Paris, France, together with several other scientists from respected institutions in Europe, confirmed the negative efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines after of a short time with positive effectiveness. Between six and about 9 months, spot efficacy was negative at 84%.
The survey sought to identify the effectiveness of vaccines administered in the autumn and winter of 2022 to 2023 against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection among people aged 60 and over. It involved data from 9308 patients that were collected in 11 locations: Croatia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal, Netherlands, Romania, Spain and Sweden. The outcome assessed was a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in patients who sought medical care with respiratory symptoms.
Study graph
Explanation of the graph: the orange spheres compare those recently vaccinated with those who have never been vaccinated (“absolute efficacy”, in the paper’s terminology). Between 180 and 269 days after vaccination, those vaccinated had a negative efficacy point estimate of 84%. In other words, almost double the chance of testing positive for COVID-19. The study compared other subgroups of patients, such as those recently vaccinated with those who were not recently vaccinated, but who may have been vaccinated before (“seasonal efficacy”, in the paper's terminology). However, in all comparisons the point estimate of efficacy was negative after 180 days.
Study confirms previous research
Negative effectiveness of vaccines has already been documented in previous studies , such as the one from the Cleveland Clinic, published in June 2023 in the peer-reviewed journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases.
Cleveland Clinic Study Chart: Cumulative incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for study participants stratified by number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The start day was September 12, 2022, the date the bivalent vaccine was first offered to employees. The more doses were taken, the greater the chance of catching COVID-19.
MPV Comment (Médicos pela Vida)
Any type of government coercion must be stopped immediately. Government recommendations should also be immediately reviewed, especially for groups at low risk of lethality, such as babies, children and young people.
Source
read more
The more doses you take, the greater your chance of contracting COVID-19, reveals study
Editorial: Minister Nísia needs to explain why Brazil became a dumping ground for rejected pharmaceutical products
Data presented by the CDC in June 2024 shows the Covid “vaccines” have negative efficacy over time. This means the injected are at greater risk of hospitalisation when infected by Sars-Cov-2 than the unjected. Even if the injected took a booster that might help for a few months - the Covid “vaccine” turn to negative efficacy even after a time when compared to the unjected. This was already known in 2022 about Modernas Covid 19 mRNA injection.
Is it not the plan to make everyone reliant on "vaccines" and this data will encourage people to go get more, despite the disappeared side effects? Whilst it talks about more likely to get the alleged virus, it does not mention all the other infections, urinary tract, kidney, bronchial, cellulitis, I hear about, or, the development of autoimmune problems, that probably are included in the "disappeared" ones.