More mRNA coming up - mRESVIA
One would think authorities and pharmaceutical companies would listen to warnings and understand when people protest against a certain drug. In Japan the WHO rallies clearly stated they do not want any more replikation “vaccines” in their country. Never in my life have I seen so many different doctors appeals around the world due to the Covid mRNA genetic injections. Dr. Michael Palmer warned in an interview with Laura Lynn Tyler of the flaws of the mRNA injection technology and that the body has a DNA limit - if the limit is exceeded it leads to death. The mRA injection technology is already known to damage the immunesystem. There is increased cancerrisk, autoimmune diseases, blood clots and heart problems from this mRNA injection technology that makes the body produce synthetic toxins that are harmful to the cells of the body. It has shown to pass over into breastmilk. People in the EU parliament have issued a moratorium for both human and veterinary use about mRNA injection technology. During Covid-19 scientific studies have also declaired moratoriums against the mRNA injection technology. When the Covid-19 mRNA injections were launched they were launched on the knowledge of more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group. The mRNA injection technology gave no benifit for children at all - it created more problems. There is now also an international Hope Accord petition to stop the Covid-19 mRNA injections. The mRNA injection technology alterns human DNA and this genetic change is passed to offspring - in Sweden it goes against the law of genetic integriy (2006:351) and any such medical technology may not be used.
The swedish medicines paper, Läkemedelsvärlden, published a PR piece on the next upcoming mRNA injection against the RSV infection (Respiratory syncytial (sin-SISH-ul) virus). “The vaccine stimulates the body to, among other things, produce neutralizing antibodies against the RS virus. The vaccine is based on the same mRNA technology that enabled Moderna to develop a vaccine against covid-19 in record time during the first year of the pandemic.” The phrasing from the Läkemedelsvärlden sends warningsignals. Has this medicines paper learned nothing from Covid-19 and what independent research is showing? Are they numb? “After a median follow-up of 3.7 months, the vaccine reduced the risk of lower respiratory tract infection caused by RS virus by 83.7 percent.” These are the exact same lies we were told about the Covid-19 mRNA injections where the Absolute Risk Reduction (AAR) of the Covid mRNA injection is a little more or less 1 %. What Läkemedelsvärlden just proclaimed was the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) pharmaceutical companies use in their marketing strategies.
Läkemedelsvärlden: “The European Medicines authority EMA recommends that the EU approve an mRNA vaccine against RSV infection in people aged 60 and over. The Commission usually follows the EMA's recommendations. If that happens this time too, it will be the first time that the EU approves an mRNA vaccine against an infection other than covid-19.” The EMA during Covid-19 showed a different kind of Covid-19 mRNA injections were used instead of those from the offical studies. The mRNA injections used within the EU were illegally approved. Former MEP Marcel de Graaf and other people in the EU Parliament showed this.
I am wondering about interaction warning - what happens when people have a lot of different mRNA injections? These are not usual vaccines. Are there any animal studies showing these risks? Do they always take the most dangerous and toxic part of a virus for the mRNA injection technology?
mRESVIA has already been approved in the USA.
Dr. Peter McCullough reported:
”Many have approached me at large events and have expressed concerns that the vaccine manufacturers where going to use mRNA on a non-emergency basis to make new and routine vaccinations for children and adults. Their concerns stem from the horrific safety profile of COVID-19 mRNA products and the complete lack of testing for genotoxicity, oncogenicity, and long-term side effects.
/—-/
The press release does not tell the public the absolute risk reduction for clinically significant outcomes was far below 1%, meaning this product will not have a significant clinical impact. Consumers should know that at the bare minimum, the following safety concerns exists for any pseudouridinated, synthetic mRNA product including mRESVIA(R):
Myocarditis because mRNA of all types targets the heart as shown by Krauson et al
Auto-immunity because of the generation of foreign RSV proteins and frameshifted peptides as shown by Boros et al
Genomic integration as shown by Alden et al
Oncogenicity as shown by Seneff et al
It may turn out that uncontrolled production of stabilized RSV prefusion F glycoprotein is far more toxic than the Wuhan Spike protein causing an entire array of new problems that we will encounter as more get vaccinated over time.
I suggest if an RSV vaccine is going to be taken, select an antigen-based product (ABRYSVO, AREXVY) and not genetic mRESVIA(R).”
It is the same kind of problems as with the Covid-19 mRNA injections. Also Moderna did not take the necessary steps to eliminate cancerrisk even when they knew and had the technolgy to do so. Will there be nanotech going on here too?
mRNA injection technology has already proven to worsen the effect and severity of a virus it is claimed to work against (430 % heightened risk of death, 260 % heightened spread). mRNA injection technology does not give immunity against a virus - only gives symptom relief against the chosen protein (the clinical idea of what the diagnosis is). All cause mortality increased in the most mRNA injected countries during Covid-19. This mRNA injection technology has negative efficacy. Prognosis of mRNA injection technology show either healthrisk or risk of death 5 - 15 years after being injected.
Läkemedelsvärlden: “RS virus (respiratory syncytial virus) is a common and contagious virus that usually only leads to a common cold, but can affect children and the elderly more severely. As Läkemedelsvärlden has reported, there are already two EU-approved vaccines against the RS virus in the elderly.”
Symptoms of RS virus:
Signs and symptoms of respiratory syncytial virus infection most commonly appear about four to six days after exposure to the virus. In adults and older children, RSV usually causes mild cold-like signs and symptoms. These may include:
Congested or runny nose
Dry cough
Low-grade fever
Sore throat
Sneezing
Headache
In severe cases
RSV infection can spread to the lower respiratory tract, causing pneumonia or bronchiolitis — inflammation of the small airway passages entering the lungs. Signs and symptoms may include:
Fever
Severe cough
Wheezing — a high-pitched noise that's usually heard on breathing out (exhaling)
Rapid breathing or difficulty breathing — the person may prefer to sit up rather than lie down
Bluish color of the skin due to lack of oxygen (cyanosis)
Infants are most severely affected by RSV. Signs and symptoms of severe RSV infection in infants include:
Short, shallow and rapid breathing
Struggling to breathe — chest muscles and skin pull inward with each breath
Cough
Poor feeding
Unusual tiredness (lethargy)
Irritability
Most children and adults recover in one to two weeks, although some might have repeated wheezing. Severe or life-threatening infection requiring a hospital stay may occur in premature infants or in anyone who has chronic heart or lung problems. Reference: Mayo Clinic
Dr. Mercola reported: Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues”
An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was reached in January 2022
Additional shots are in development to target HIV, zika virus, Nipah virus, cancer, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, influenza (mRNA) and more
Many other vaccines are also under development, including a Phase 3 study looking at combining Pfizer’s COVID-19 injection with their Prevnar 20™ (pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine) for adults aged 65 and older.20
Reminders:
Clinicl trial of mRNA birdflu has already shown there is a five times higher death rate in the injection group compared to the unjected group: 1 in 200 people DIED taking part in clinical trials of a new bird flu (mRNA) injection AUDENZ made by CSL Seqirus. In the group that got the injection, 0.5% people died - placebo group, 0.1% of people died in the clinical trial.
Dr. Peter A. McCullough on Real America's Voice with Michelle Backus explains the health risks of mRNA injections for the birdflu if rolled out for humans. The self-replicating messenger RNA injection against the birdflu produces the dangerous hemagglutinase that is the most dangerous part of the birdflu virus.
Covid-19 mRNA injection technology produces the spikeprotein that is the most toxic and bioactive part of Sars-Cov-2: After two doses of the genetic injection it is impossible to create new natural immunity against new variants. After 3 - 4 doses IgG4 class switch occurs, and produces non-neutralising antibodies, where the genetic injection no longer protects the person but instead protects the virus which leads to worse health outcomes for the injected if they are infected by Sars-Cov-2. At this stage the Covid injection also suppresses the immune system and promotes breakthough infections. Elevated IgG4 levels are creating immune pressure that will select for highly virulent escape variants (Geert van den Bossche). The process of antigenic sin from the genetic injections have been scientifically proven from even more doses. There are a few very troubling aspects at play. Only the genetically injected worsen the status of the virus and spread the virus (Covid-19 was over for the unjected a long time ago). Antigenic sin also means you can no longer form antibodies against new variants because once an antibody has been created, based on an updated injection, only the previous variant's antibody can be induced. Clinical research on animal studies have shown 6 - 7 injections with the genetic Covid injection (spike protein) lead to death and infertility in the test animals. (Reference: Professor Yasufumi Murakami, Japan).
The Eternal Dangers of RNA-Vaccines, Doctors 4 Covid Ethics
mRNA Vaccine Toxicity, Doctors 4 Covid Ethics