Batch dependent adverse events C-19 injections
A new study about Sweden and Denmark concerning batch dependent side-effects confirm what previous studies on the matter also have shown. What is exposed here is also there are more side effects concerning women about the batch dependent harms from the Covid 19 injections. This finding is peculiar: “The batch-dependent safety signal observed in Denmark and now confirmed in Sweden suggests that early commercial batches of BNT162b2 may have differed from those used later on, and these preliminary and hypothesis-generating results warrant further study.”
The batch study shows 3 groupings: one with no harm (placebo rolled out at 30 % ?), one with relative severe side affects and a third grouping with very severe side effects (SAE). The Swedish Doctors Appeal commented this study on X: “Vaccination should only have been allowed to continue if all batches had belonged to the group of harmless side effects.” It seems Sweden cares more about alcohol than vaccines - the Swedish Doctors Appeal commented the following: “What is described in point 2, the wide variation in content for different batches, is unacceptable. This applies to any product on a market. For example, the other day Systembolaget (the Swedish state-owned company that has a monopoly in Sweden on selling drinks with an alcohol content above 3.5%) announced that it is recalling a batch of 750 bottles of strong beer that was wrongly labelled as non-alcoholic beer. Pontus Jennerholm, Product Quality Manager at Systembolaget, said in a press release: "This is very serious. One should of course be able to trust that an article that has a label labelled non-alcoholic is also non-alcoholic".
Some highlights from the study:
“Most reported SAEs were for women, who comprised approximately 70% and 75% of all SAE reports in Denmark and Sweden, respectively, during the study period. In both countries, women represented 85–90% of SAE reports in the early phase of BNT162b2 vaccine roll-out, where high SAE rate batches were apparent (see below). In Denmark, approximately 40% of all SAE reports were from healthcare workers, and this proportion was lower in Sweden, where healthcare workers submitted approximately 15% of reports. However, in both Denmark and Sweden, the percentages of SAE reports from healthcare workers were higher (approximately 50% and 30%, respectively) for the early administered vaccine batches compared with those administered later on. In both countries, a majority of persons (up to 90%) reporting SAEs with the early high SAE rate vaccine batches were <70 years of age, while the proportion of elderly people with reported SAEs rose sharply thereafter.”
“A commercial vaccine product should be identical in all batches including those shared between countries, and it is surmised that vaccinated individuals in Denmark and Sweden objectively encountered the same rates of SAEs and had similar means and opportunity to report SAEs. Therefore, our data suggest that mild SAEs were markedly under-reported in Sweden during the early phase of vaccine roll-out.”
“Whether healthcare workers in Sweden were less inclined to report SAEs from the BNT162b2 vaccine in Sweden requires further study, including to determine the potential role of the perceived risk that such reports may be linked to repressive measures from governmental and regional health authorities.” To this finding from the study it has been reported by the journalist Per Shapiro in interviews with swedish nurses if they encouraged covid vaccine injured persons to have their side effects reported to the swedish medicines agency the nurses would be reported to the security police or lose their job. The swedish physician Dr. Sture Blomberg has reported on his blog swedish physicians were not allowed to critisize the covid vaccines.